Sunday, November 4

Be a great poet! Or a good poet. Or a better poet than you are now.

There are volumes and volumes of information about how to learn to write poetry, from no-nonsense meter-and-verse specififics to whoa-man stuff about opening your senses and letting it flow freeform onto the page. There are even people to whom the shape of the poem itself as written conveys some meaning. Without rehashing any of this information, I want to add my two cents to the pile, but first let me warn you there are dozens of ways to write great poetry that don't all have much in common.

You could write "perfect" verse, like Roger Waters sometimes does, extremely economical with every word in its place, rhyming (often cleverly), and a crystal clear, beautiful meaning intact. This is a rare gift not everyone can achieve and I won't elaborate more on it here.

You could write "super sensory" verse like Sylvia Plath did, where "sensory" included the interpretation of her external senses and the effects they had upon her spirit. She could describe a simple scene like a bee's nest and use the most unexpected words and phrasing, yet in the end you had a very vivid, almost living sense of what she felt and experienced looking at that hive.

And so on. There are many forms of classic poetry, many which are quite beautiful and which seem simplistic but are quite challenging to adopt and say anything useful in. Some are archaic, mostly used for the telling of epic tales, and today have been mostly replaced by prose except in spots where they are meant to be archaic, like Tolkien's Elvish "lays." Mostly they're tedious though.

Anyway, my advice has nothing to do with the type of poem you want to write (perhaps it's easiest thought of in terms of free verse, but is surely not limited to it), but in the psychological way in which you set about writing the thing. Some poems are too wild, most are too tame. Of course you should avoid cliches, and read up on alliteration and all the other hallmarks of poetry, but if I could advise someone in two simple bullet point on how to write a good, original poem, given they know these basics, it would be these:

(1) Be as wild in your thinking as you can. To use a cliche, think outside the box. Use your senses in unique ways and experiment with words, word-order, jumbles of syntax, hidden meaning beneath obvious meanings, no 'meaning' at all, whatever. Just let your mind roam, and take notes. If this requires a pen and paper or a voice recorder, use those. Sitting in front of a computer isn't always an inspirational place to write. Go to the beach and take a voice recorder, and merely speak words, phrases, exclamations, questions when they occur to you. Make the process wild and the mechanism of recording it as inobtrusive as possible. Be as creative if you can.

(2) But, equally as important, you need a crap filter that is just as strong when it comes time to taking all that raw material and forging an actual poem out of it. I believe that poetry is a learned craft that very few if any come to already possessing mastery. That is why a poet must be part craftsman, and that usually involves pruning a lot and pulling weeds and killing even good ideas because you can't make them work. As much as you let your mind run wild before, now be the strictest censor when it comes to letting that stuff make it into your final poems. For every phrase of genius there may be ten that are useless. That's why it's called "raw" material. You need to refine this stuff to get maybe just a nugget or two from that vast heap. Then you can do it all over again. But the point is, just because something was written in an orgy of splendid sensory exuberance does not mean it automatically belongs in a poem, at least not a good poem.


I could go into more detail and give examples, but for now I won't. If there are people interested in watching a poem being wrought from start to finish I could probably do a blog entry on that. But the main points I wanted to make in this one is in the general: House two extreme, opposite personalities within your mind - and bring each out one after another. Go through a wild, unfettered, break-all-the-rules manic phase; then, crucially, go through a strict, tighten-it-up, toss out what is crap or even what is lovely but just doesn't work, chip and polish beautiful stone into a beautiful sculpture phase.

With just these two points in mind, I think you'll find the quality of your poetry will improve.

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

I could write a scientific equation, but a poem ... I doubt it. But someone needs to do it!

Anonymous said...

And you do a good job! I think I will leave this one up to you.

Metamatician said...

Hehe, thanks for the compliment. I'll leave the computer code, the X-Ray/CT/MR readings, and everything to do with trains up to you. We can split the scientific equations down the middle!

Thanks for reading my on again/off again blog too, I do appreciate it.

Sara said...

I'm an undisciplined, random poet and probably could learn a lot from reading about the process of construction. However, I'm a lazy mare (read my last blog entry) and poetic inspiration just grabs me out of the blue. So it's a question of quickly writing down whatever imagery or emotion is erupting. It's like catching an elusive and wild animal as it rushes past and I can never tell when the next one will be coming along.

Did any of that make sense? I should probably have written a poem :-)

Thesaurus Rex said...

There was a young man from Oxnard
Who thought himself poet and bard
He got such a thrill
From the tip off his quill
That his 'appendage got rather hard

(boom boom)

So, whadya think. Am I getting better, or is there still a little room for improvement. After all, I was just following your instructions, you word guru you.
I'll put some other stuff down to raise the intellectual tone another time, but til then, I'm off to ruin somebody else's blog.

Anonymous said...

If he is your best student meta, you are in big trouble!!

JOVIAN said...

good general info for a budding poet. poetry, interestingly, is one of the intangible art forms and is more akin to modern art than any other form of expressionism. i agree that it is a craft to some some degree but 90% of it is feeling as opposed to somthing learnable and tuneable. a poet is a poet. and potter is a potter. simple as that.

Metamatician said...

Great to see we have so many opinions on the subject! Now remember, you first assignment is due next week on the subtless of spiders - Delusionist, I want several in different styles from you.

As for you Rex, my star pupil, you get the week off just for working the word 'appendage' into this one.

Ox nards...

Hans said...

Poe, Poet, Poem, Poetry
Hoe, Hoe it, Ho Hum, Hoe a tree
Doe, Donut, D'oh Dumb, Don't agree
Foe, Forget it, Fold 'em, Forgery

Best I can do.

Metamatician said...

@Mags: You're a very good poet, but you usually stick to Haiku (which is not a bad thing). Have you tried branching out more? Haikus are nice because they are so short ;-) But I'm sure you've dabbled (or more) with longer forms.

Metamatician said...

Delusionist - I agree with you on the whole, some people have a gift for it due to their inborn personality (genetics) and others don't (Bytedoc). But by stressing it is also part craft I'm trying to encourage those in the middle to give it a shot. Hell, even the best poets always felt they were crap and could be so much better. A true artist should never be satisfied. They are the ones who cut trails with machetes that others come along and turn into roads.

Archived Posts

Search The Meta-Plane